CJUS 410 #2

CJUS 410 #2Questions Use proper etiquette in discussion. Quality as well as quantity counts. Present your own opinion on the assigned topic in a 300–500-word thread. Provide at least 1 reference and 1 Scripture in support of your thread.Discussion Board Grading RubricStudent:CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints EarnedInstructor’s CommentsThreadAll key components of the Discussion Board Forum prompts are answered in a new thread that includes 1 reference and 1 scripture.25Major points are supported by the following:·      Reading & Study materials·      Good examples (pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples are acceptable)·      Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts)40Proper spelling and grammar are used.25Required word count (300–500 words) is met.10RepliesRequired word count (150–250 words each) for 2 replies is met.5Major points are supported by the following:·      Reading & Study materials·      Good examples (pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples are acceptable)·      Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts)20Appropriate “netiquette” manners are used (for example, no name-calling or labeling another student’s idea a derogatory term, such as “stupid” or “dumb,” even when disagreeing—see Student Expectations).5Proper spelling and grammar are used.20Total150Research and read the article by Donald Dripps entitled “The Case for the Contingent Exclusionary Rule,” from the American Criminal Law Review (Winter, 2001).Based on the article and your current level of exposure to the topic of constitutional criminal procedure, outline your position as to how Dripps’ model would work in the real world.Refer to Dr. Kahlib Fischer’s presentation in Module/Week 1. State whether Dripps’ Model of “Contingent Suppression” is in any way compatible with restorative justice. If not, how could it be made more compatible?Provide at least 1 reference and 1 scripture in support of your post.Respond to 2 other classmates’ threads, constructively challenging or defending their position, by listing and analyzing their comments.